March 7, 2009

Supreme Court Case on FDA Regulations and Injury Lawsuits Discussion – Fort Lauderdale Injury Attorney

Fort Lauderdale injury lawyer Andrew Alitowski knows that the Food and Drug Administration has been under fire for quite some time now. From inadequately inspected foods that resulted in American illnesses, such as the peanut butter scare stemming from a poorly-sanitized Georgia plant, to the infant formula scare in China that drew questions about our own inspections of foreign products, the FDA has struggled with food and drug safety issues in the public limelight frequently in recent years. As a Broward injury attorney, Andrew Alitowski remains concerned about the well-being of Floridians in all aspects, but particularly in terms of the safety of drugs on the shelves of our supermarkets and pharmacies.

The United States Supreme Court issued an important ruling on prescription drug safety this week. The Justices held that people who have been hurt by drug side effects or other problems can file personal injury suits at the state level, upholding a multi-million dollar verdict against the prescription drug company Wyeth. The drug company had claimed that these lawsuits were invalid because the drug companies were subject only to federal regulation through the FDA. In upholding the right file personal injury lawsuits at the state level, the Justices offered a ringing endorsement of the beneficial effects these suits can have. Justice Stevens wrote that, “State tort suits uncover unknown drug hazards and provide incentives for drug manufacturers to disclose safety risks promptly. They also serve a distinct compensatory function that may motivate injured persons to come forward with information.” He also wrote that the FDA has limited resources, yet must monitor in excess of 11,000 drugs. Justice Stevens cited many studies that have found that the FDA is overburdened and not as effective as it should be. He opined that “state law offers an additional, and important, layer of consumer protection” that can supplement the regulations set forth by the FDA.

Broward plaintiff’s attorneys Alitowski and Moore could not agree more with Justice Stevens. The importance of allowing personal injury lawsuits at the state level cannot be overstated. The potential for costly verdicts and bad press compels companies to follow the law and work to make their products safer. Furthermore, products that are unsafe come to the attention of the public much faster due to these suits. Most importantly, the consumers who are injured can be compensated – for pain and suffering, for medical expenses, and for other damages. In some cases, the companies who manufacture defective or otherwise problematic products, including prescription medications, must pay punitive damages.

Continue reading "Supreme Court Case on FDA Regulations and Injury Lawsuits Discussion – Fort Lauderdale Injury Attorney" »

February 19, 2009

Fort Lauderdale Personal Injury Attorney – A Verdict in the Tobacco Case

Fort Lauderdale accident lawyer Andrew Alitowski has been following the Florida tobacco case for years. In 2006, a Miami-Dade jury awarded the plaintiffs in a class-action suit a record $145 billion in punitive damages against cigarette-maker and tobacco company Philip Morris. After winding its way through the appellate process, the Florida Supreme Court determined that the civil suit should not have been tried as a class action. Instead, it gave each of the plaintiffs one year to file their lawsuits individually. Nonetheless, the Florida Supreme Court agreed with the trial court finding that the tobacco industry willfully misrepresented the addictiveness of tobacco products and their negative health effects. Fort Lauderdale injury attorney Alitowski has followed the progression of this case with interest.

The first individual tobacco case went to trial in Broward County and the six-person jury began considering its merits last week. As previously discussed on this Fort Lauderdale personal injury lawyer blog and in the local news media, the Hess family sued Philip Morris for the wrongful death of Stuart Hess, a 55-year-old husband and father who died of lung cancer. The Hess family contended that Stuart was unable to quit smoking cigarettes due to his addiction, which led to his death. Stuart smoked for 40 years, going through about two packs of cigarettes every day. The jury agreed with the Hess family – at least in part -- and returned a civil verdict yesterday, after deliberating for two days.

Elaine Hess, the widow of Stuart Hess, had asked for a verdict of $130 million, which the jury rejected. Because Florida is a comparative negligence jurisdiction, the jury was allowed to consider the behavior of Stuart Hess in its decision. The jury determined that Stuart’s actions were 58 percent negligent and that Philip Morris was thus responsible for only 42 percent of the total damages to his widow and son David. With that calculation, the jury awarded Elaine Hess $2 million for her losses and $1 million to David for his compensatory damages. They additionally awarded $5 million in punitive damages.

At this point in time, Fort Lauderdale plaintiff’s attorney Andrew Alitowski says there are in excess of 8,000 similar tobacco cases awaiting trial in Florida. The Hess case was the first of the former class action cases to see a jury. Following the verdict, Elaine Hess indicated that her decision to go to trial was not for financial gain. “Nothing can make up for the loss,” she said of her husband. Lawyers for Philip Hess contend that the verdict is not representative of the likely outcome of the thousands of cases still pending in Florida courts. About 4,000 cases are pending in the federal court system following the 2006 Florida Supreme Court ruling.

The following video shows a good example of the misleading advertising engaged in by Big Tobacco. Now famous, the Camel cigarette television ad brags that “more doctors smoke Camels”:

Continue reading "Fort Lauderdale Personal Injury Attorney – A Verdict in the Tobacco Case" »